Collaborative legal processes also have the added benefit of being cost-effective for the parties involved. Since the necessary tasks are assigned to experts in the collaborative model without duplication of work, cost savings are achieved.  These cost savings, among other potential benefits, have led parties in other contexts to explore the use of collaborative law to resolve disputes, including mergers and acquisitions.  In the United States, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act 2009 was passed by the Uniform Law Commission, allowing individual states to enact it as law. In 2010, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was amended to add several options and renamed the Uniform Collaborative Law Rules and Act. In June 2013, the Uniform Collaborative Law Act was drafted in the states of Utah, Nevada, Texas, Hawaii, Ohio, the District of Columbia and Washington state and passed by the Alabama legislature, but was awaiting the governor`s signature and was still pending in several other U.S. states.  In Texas, Harry Tindall, a Houston-based family law attorney, was instrumental in the Texas legislature`s passage of UCLA.  On March 24, 2016, Florida Governor Rick Scott signed the Collaborative Law Process Act, Florida`s version of the Uniform Collaborative Law Act, which creates a legal privilege that allows confidential communication during the collaborative process.  “If a party decides to withdraw from the collaborative law process, the other party must be notified immediately in writing through its counsel. At the end of the collaborative law process by a party or lawyer, there is a thirty (30) day waiting period (except in cases of urgency) before each court hearing so that the parties can retain the services of new lawyers and make an orderly transition. All fixed-term contracts remain in full force during this period.
The purpose of this provision is to avoid surprises and interference with the rights of the other party. It was therefore mutually agreed that any Contracting Party may draw the court`s attention to this provision in order to request the postponement of a hearing. Collaborative divorce offers an alternative procedure for parties seeking an amicable settlement. Collaborative divorce promotes agreement and the free exchange of information through private negotiations. .